First Vatican Council
1869-1870 A.D.
SESSION 1 : 8 December 1869
Decree of opening of the
council
Pius, bishop, servant of
the servants of God, with the approval of the sacred council, for an
everlasting record. Most reverend fathers, is it your pleasure that, to the
praise and glory of the holy and undivided Trinity, Father, Son and holy
Spirit, for the increase and exaltation of the catholic faith and religion, for
the uprooting of current errors,
for the reformation of the
clergy and the christian people, and for the common peace and concord of all,
the holy ecumenical Vatican council should be opened, and be declared to have
been opened?
[They replied: Yes]
Pius, bishop, servant of
the servants of God, with the approval of the sacred council, for an
everlasting record. Most reverend fathers, is it your pleasure that the next
session of the holy ecumenical Vatican council should be held on the feast of
the Epiphany of the Lord, that is 6 January 1870?
[They replied: Yes]
SESSION 2 : 6 January 1870
Profession of faith
I, Pius, bishop of the
catholic church, with firm faith believe and profess each and every article
contained in the profession of faith which the holy Roman church uses, namely:
I believe in one God the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things
seen and unseen. And in one Lord Jesus Christ the only-begotten Son of God.
Born of the Father before all ages. God from God, light from light, true God
from true God. Begotten not made, of one substance with the Father: through
whom all things were made. Who for us humans and for our salvationcame down
from heaven. He was incarnate by the holy Spirit of the virgin Mary: and became
man. He was crucified also for us, he suffered under Pontius Pilate and was
buried. The third day he rose again according to the scriptures. He
ascended into heaven and
sits at the right hand of the Father. He shall come again with glory to judge
the living and the dead, and of his kingdom there shall be no end. And in the
holy Spirit, the lord and the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and
the Son. Who together with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified: who
spoke through the prophets. And one holy, catholic and apostolic church. I
confess one baptism for the remission of Sins.
And I look for the
resurrection of the dead. And the life of the world to come Amen. Apostolic and
ecclesiastical traditions and all other observances and constitutions of that
same church I most firmly accept and embrace. Likewise I accept sacred
scripture according to that sense which holy mother church held and holds,
since it is her right to judge of the true sense and interpretation of the holy
scriptures; nor will I ever receive and interpret them except according to the
unanimous consent of the fathers. I profess also that there are seven
sacraments of the new law, truly and properly so called, instituted by our lord
Jesus Christ and necessary for salvation, though each person need not receive
them all. They are: baptism, confirmation, the Eucharist, penance, last
anointing, order and
matrimony; and they confer
grace. Of these baptism, confirmation and order may not be repeated without
sacrilege.
I likewise receive and
accept the rites of the catholic church which have been received and approved
in the solemn administration of all the aforesaid sacraments. I embrace and
accept the whole and every part of what was defined and declared by the holy
council of Trent concerning original sin and justification. Likewise I profess
that in the mass there is offered to God a true, proper and propitiatory
sacrifice for the living and the dead; and that in the most holy sacrament of
the Eucharist there is truly, really and substantially the body and blood,
together with the soul and divinity, of our lord Jesus Christ; and that there
takes place the conversion of the whole substance of the bread into his body,
and of the whole substance of the wine into his blood, and this conversion the
catholic church calls transubstantiation. I confess that under either species
alone the whole and complete Christ and the true sacrament are received. I
firmly hold that purgatory exists, and that the souls detained there are helped
by the suffrages of the faithful. Likewise, that the saints reigning with
Christ are to be honoured and prayed to, and that they offer prayers to God on
our behalf, and that their relics should be venerated. I resolutely assert that
images of Christ and the ever virgin mother of God, and likewise those of the
other saints, are to be kept and retained, and that due honour and reverence is
to be shown them. I affirm that the power of indulgences was left by Christ in
the church, and that their use is eminently beneficial to the christian people.
I acknowledge the holy, catholic, apostolic and Roman church, the mother and
mistress of all the churches [1] . Likewise all other things which have been
transmitted, defined and declared by the sacred canons and the ecumenical
councils, especially the sacred Trent, I accept unhesitatingly and profess; in
the same way whatever is to the contrary, and whatever heresies have been
condemned, rejected and anathematised by the church, I too condemn, reject and
anathematise.
This true catholic faith,
outside of which none can be saved, which I now freely profess and truly hold ,
is what I shall steadfastly maintain and confess, by the help of God, in all
its completeness and purity until my dying breath, and I shall do my best to
ensure [2] that all others do the same. This is what I, the same Pius, promise,
vow and swear. So help me God and these holy gospels of God.
SESSION 3 : 24 April 1870
Dogmatic constitution on
the catholic faith
Pius, bishop, servant of
the servants of God, with the approval of the sacred council, for an
everlasting record.
The Son of God, redeemer of
the human race, our lord Jesus Christ, promised, when about to return to his
heavenly Father, that he would be with this church militant upon earth all days
even to the end of the world [3] . Hence never at any time has he ceased to
stand by his beloved bride, assisting her when she teaches, blessing her in her
labours and bringing her help when she is in danger. Now this redemptive
providence appears very clearly in unnumbered benefits, but most especially is
it manifested in the advantages which have been secured for the christian world
by ecumenical councils, among which the council of Trent requires special
mention, celebrated though it was in evil days. Thence came a closer definition
and more fruitful exposition of the holy dogmas of religion and the
condemnation and repression of errors; thence too, the restoration and vigorous
strengthening of ecclesiastical discipline, the advancement of the clergy in
zeal for learning and piety, the founding of colleges for the training of the
young for the service of religion; and finally the renewal of the moral life of
the christian people by a more accurate instruction of the faithful, and a more
frequent reception of the sacraments. What is more, thence also came
a closer union of the
members with the visible head, and an increased vigour in the whole mystical
body of Christ. Thence came the multiplication of religious orders and other
organisations of christian piety; thence too that determined and constant
ardour for the spreading of Christ's kingdom abroad in the world, even at the
cost of shedding one's blood. While we recall with grateful hearts, as is only
fitting, these and other outstanding gains, which the divine mercy has bestowed
on the church especially by means of the last ecumenical synod, we cannot
subdue the bitter grief that we feel at most serious evils, which have largely
arisen either because the authority of the sacred synod was held in contempt by
all too many, or because its wise decrees were neglected. Everybody knows that
those heresies, condemned by the fathers of Trent, which rejected the divine
magisterium of the church and allowed religious questions to be a matter for
the judgment of each individual, have gradually collapsed into a multiplicity
of sects, either at variance or in agreement with one another; and by this
means a good many people have had all faith in Christ destroyed. Indeed even
the holy Bible itself, which they at one time claimed to be the sole source and
judge of the christian faith, is no longer held to be divine, but they begin to
assimilate it to the inventions of myth. Thereupon there came into being and
spread far and wide throughout the world that doctrine of rationalism or
naturalism, - utterly opposed to the christian religion, since this is of
supernatural origin, - which spares no effort to bring it about that Christ,
who alone is our lord and saviour, is shut out from the minds of people and the
moral life of nations. Thus they would establish what they call the rule of
simple reason or nature. The abandonment and rejection of the christian
religion, and the denial of God and his Christ, has plunged the minds of many
into the abyss of pantheism, materialism and atheism, and the consequence is
that they strive to destroy rational nature itself, to deny any criterion of
what is right and just, and to overthrow the very foundations of human society.
With this impiety spreading in every direction, it has come about, alas, that
many even among the children of the catholic church have strayed from the path
of genuine piety, and as the truth was gradually diluted in them, their
catholic sensibility was weakened. Led away by diverse and strange teachings
[4] and confusing
nature and grace, human
knowledge and divine faith, they are found to distort the genuine sense of the
dogmas which holy mother church holds and teaches, and to endanger the
integrity and genuineness of the faith. At the sight of all this, how can the
inmost being of the church not suffer anguish? For just as God wills all people
to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth [5] , just as Christ came to
save what was lost [6] and to gather into one the children of God who were
scattered abroad [7] , so the church, appointed by God to be mother and
mistress of nations, recognises her obligations to all and is always ready and
anxious to raise the fallen, to steady those who stumble, to embrace those who
return, and to strengthen the good and urge them on to what is better. Thus she
can never cease from witnessing to the truth of God which heals all [8 ] and
from declaring it, for she knows that these words were directed to her: My
spirit which is upon you, and my words which I have put in your mouth, shall
not depart out of your mouth from this time forth and for evermore [9] . And so
we, following in the footsteps of our predecessors, in accordance with our
supreme apostolic office, have never left off teaching and defending catholic
truth and condemning erroneous doctrines. But now it is our purpose to profess
and declare from this chair of Peter before all eyes the saving teaching of
Christ, and, by the power given us by God, to reject and condemn the contrary
errors. This we shall do with the bishops of the whole world as our
co-assessors and fellow-judges, gathered here as they are in the holy Spirit by
our authority in this ecumenical council, and relying on the word of God in
scripture and tradition as we have received it, religiously preserved and
authentically expounded by the catholic church
Chapter 1 On God the
creator of all things
The holy, catholic,
apostolic and Roman church believes and acknowledges that there is one true and
living God,
creator and lord of heaven
and earth, almighty, eternal, immeasurable, incomprehensible, infinite in will,
understanding and every perfection. Since he is one, singular, completely simple
and unchangeable spiritual substance, he must be declared to be in reality and
in essence, distinct from the world, supremely happy in himself and from
himself, and inexpressibly loftier than anything besides himself which either
exists or can be imagined.
This one true God, by his
goodness and almighty power, not with the intention of increasing his
happiness, nor indeed of obtaining happiness, but in order to manifest his
perfection by the good things which he bestows on what he creates, by an
absolutely free plan, together from the beginning of time brought into being
from nothing the twofold created order, that is the spiritual and the bodily,
the angelic and the earthly, and thereafter the human which is, in a way,
common to both since it is composed of spirit and body [10]. Everything that
God has brought into being he protects and governs by his providence, which
reaches from one end of the earth to the other and orders all things well [11]
. All things are open and laid bare to his eyes [12] , even those which will be
brought about by the free activity of creatures.
Chapter 2 On revelation
The same holy mother church
holds and teaches that God, the source and end of all things, can be known
with certainty from the
consideration of created things, by the natural power of human reason : ever
since the creation of the world, his invisible nature has been clearly
perceived in the things that have been made. [13]
It was, however, pleasing
to his wisdom and goodness to reveal himself and the eternal laws of his will
to the human race by
another, and that a supernatural, way. This is how the Apostle puts it : In
many and various ways God spoke of old to our fathers by the prophets; but in
these last days he has spoken to us by a Son [14] . It is indeed thanks to this
divine revelation, that those matters concerning God which are not of
themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of
the human race, be known by everyone without difficulty, with firm certitude
and with no intermingling of error. It is not because of this that one must
hold revelation to be absolutely necessary; the reason is that God directed
human beings to a supernatural end,
that is a sharing in the
good things of God that utterly surpasses the understanding of the human mind;
indeed eye has not seen, neither has ear heard, nor has it come into our hearts
to conceive what things God has prepared for those who love him [15] . Now this
supernatural revelation, according to the belief of the universal church, as
declared by the sacred council of Trent, is contained in written books and
unwritten traditions, which were received by the apostles from the lips of
Christ himself, or came to the apostles by the dictation of the holy Spirit,
and were passed on as it were from hand to hand until they reached us [16]. The
complete books of the old and the new Testament with all their parts, as they
are listed in the decree of the said council and as they are found in the old
Latin Vulgate edition, are to be received as sacred and canonical. These books
the church holds to be sacred and canonical not because she subsequently
approved them by her authority after they had been composed by unaided human
skill, nor simply because they contain revelation without error, but because,
being written under the inspiration of the holy Spirit, they have God as their
author, and were as such committed to the church.
Now since the decree on the
interpretation of holy scripture, profitably made by the council of Trent, with
the intention of constraining rash speculation, has been wrongly interpreted by
some, we renew that decree and declare its meaning to be as follows: that in
matters of faith and morals, belonging as they do to the establishing of
christian doctrine, that meaning of holy scripture must be held to be the true
one, which holy mother church held and holds,
since it is her right to
judge of the true meaning and interpretation of holy scripture. In consequence,
it is not permissible for anyone to interpret holy scripture in a sense
contrary to this, or indeed against the unanimous consent of the fathers.
Chapter 3 On faith
Since human beings are
totally dependent on God as their creator and lord, and created reason is completely
subject to uncreated truth, we are obliged to yield to God the revealer full
submission of intellect and will by faith. This faith, which is the beginning
of human salvation, the catholic church professes to be a supernatural virtue,
by means of which, with the grace of God inspiring and assisting us, we believe
to be true what He has revealed, not because we perceive its intrinsic truth by
the natural light of reason, but because of the authority of God himself, who
makes the revelation and can neither deceive nor be deceived. Faith, declares
the Apostle, is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not
seen [17]. Nevertheless, in order that the submission of our faith should be in
accordance with reason, it was God's will that there should be linked to the
internal assistance of the holy Spirit external indications of his revelation,
that is to say divine acts, and first and foremost miracles and prophecies,
which clearly demonstrating
as they do the omnipotence and infinite knowledge of God, are the most certain
signs of revelation and are suited to the understanding of all. Hence Moses and
the prophets, and especially Christ our lord himself, worked many absolutely
clear miracles and delivered prophecies; while of the apostles we read: And
they went forth and preached every, while the Lord worked with them and
confirmed the message by the signs that attended it [18] . Again it is written:
We have the prophetic word made more sure; you will do well to pay attention to
this as to a lamp shining in a dark place [19] . Now, although the assent of
faith is by no means a blind movement of the mind, yet no one can accept the
gospel preaching in the way that is necessary for achieving salvation without
the inspiration and illumination of the holy Spirit, who gives to all facility
in accepting and believing the truth [20] . And so faith in itself, even though
it may not work through charity, is a gift of God, and its operation is a work
belonging to the order of salvation, in that a person yields true obedience to
God himself when he accepts and collaborates with his grace which he could have
rejected. Wherefore, by divine and catholic faith all those things are to be
believed which are contained in the word of God as found in scripture and tradition,
and which are proposed by the church as matters to be believed as divinely
revealed, whether by her solemn judgment or in her ordinary and universal
magisterium. Since, then, without faith it is impossible to please God [21] and
reach the fellowship of his sons and daughters, it follows that no one can ever
achieve justification without it, neither can anyone attain eternal life unless
he or she perseveres in it to the end. So that we could fulfil our duty of
embracing the true faith and of persevering unwaveringly in it, God, through
his only begotten Son, founded the church,
and he endowed his
institution with clear notes to the end that she might be recognised by all as
the guardian and teacher of the revealed word. To the catholic church alone belong
all those things, so many and so marvellous, which have been divinely ordained
to make for the manifest credibility of the christian faith. What is more, the
church herself by reason of her astonishing propagation, her outstanding
holiness and her inexhaustible fertility in every kind of goodness, by her
catholic unity and her unconquerable stability, is a kind of great and
perpetual motive of credibility and an incontrovertible evidence of her own
divine mission. So it comes about that, like a standard lifted up for the
nations [22] , she both invites to herself those who have not yet believed, and
likewise assures her sons and daughters that the faith they profess rests on
the firmest of foundations. To this witness is added the effective help of power
from on high. For, the kind Lord stirs up those who go astray and helps them by
his grace so that they may come to the knowledge of the truth [23] ; and also
confirms by his grace those whom he has translated into his admirable light
[24], so that they may persevere in this light, not abandoning them unless he
is first abandoned. Consequently, the situation of those, who by the heavenly
gift of faith have embraced the catholic truth, is by no means the same as that
of those who, led by human opinions, follow a false religion;
for those who have accepted
the faith under the guidance of the church can never have any just cause for
changing this faith or for calling it into question. This being so, giving
thanks to God the Father who has made us worthy to share with the saints in
light [25] let us not neglect so great a salvation [26] , but looking unto
Jesus the author and finisher of our faith [27] , let us hold the unshakeable
confession of our hope [28].
Chapter 4. On faith and
reason
The perpetual agreement of
the catholic church has maintained and maintains this too: that there is a
twofold order of knowledge, distinct not only as regards its source, but also
as regards its object. With regard to the source,
we know at the one level by
natural reason, at the other level by divine faith. With regard to the object,
besides those things to which natural reason can attain, there are proposed for
our belief mysteries hidden in God which, unless they are divinely revealed,
are incapable of being known. Wherefore, when the Apostle, who witnesses that
God was known to the gentiles from created things [29] , comes to treat of the
grace and truth which came by Jesus Christ [30] , he declares: We impart a
secret and hidden wisdom of God, which God decreed before the ages for our
glorification. None of the rulers of this age understood this. God has revealed
it to us through the Spirit. For the Spirit searches everything, even the
depths of God [31] . And the Only-begotten himself, in his confession to the
Father, acknowledges that the Father has hidden these things from the wise and
prudent and revealed them to the little ones [32] . Now reason, does indeed
when it seeks persistently, piously and soberly, achieve by God's gift some
understanding, and that most profitable, of the mysteries, whether by analogy
from what it knows naturally, or from the connexion of these mysteries with one
another and with the final end of humanity; but reason is never rendered
capable of penetrating these mysteries in the way in which it penetrates those
truths which form its proper object. For the divine mysteries, by their very
nature, so far surpass the created understanding that, even when a revelation
has been given and accepted by faith, they remain covered by the veil of that
same faith and wrapped, as it were, in a certain obscurity, as long as in this
mortal life we are away from the Lord, for we walk by faith, and not by sight
[33] . Even though faith is above reason, there can never be any real
disagreement between faith and reason, since it is the same God who reveals the
mysteries and infuses faith, and who has endowed the human mind with the light
of reason. God cannot deny himself, nor can truth ever be in opposition to
truth. The appearance of this kind of specious contradiction is chiefly due to
the fact that either the dogmas of faith are not understood and explained in
accordance with the mind of the church, or unsound views are mistaken for the
conclusions of reason.
Therefore we define that
every assertion contrary to the truth of enlightened faith is totally false
[34] . Furthermore the church which, together with its apostolic office of
teaching, has received the charge of preserving the deposit of faith, has by
divine appointment the right and duty of condemning what wrongly passes for
knowledge, lest anyone be led astray by philosophy and empty deceit [35] .
Hence all faithful Christians are forbidden to defend as the legitimate
conclusions of science those opinions which are known to be contrary to the
doctrine of faith, particularly if they have been condemned by the church; and
furthermore they are absolutely bound to hold them to be errors which wear the
deceptive appearance of truth. Not only can faith and reason never be at odds
with one another but they mutually support each other, for on the one hand
right reason established the foundations of the faith and, illuminated by its
light, develops the science of divine things; on the other hand, faith delivers
reason from errors and protects it and furnishes it with knowledge of many
kinds. Hence, so far is the church from hindering the development of human arts
and studies, that in fact she assists and promotes them in many ways. For
she is neither ignorant nor
contemptuous of the advantages which derive from this source for human life,
rather
she acknowledges that those
things flow from God, the lord of sciences, and, if they are properly used,
lead to God by the help of his grace. Nor does the church forbid these studies
to employ, each within its own area, its own proper principles and method: but
while she admits this just freedom, she takes particular care that they do not
become infected with errors
by conflicting with divine teaching, or, by going beyond their proper limits,
intrude upon what belongs to faith and engender confusion. For the doctrine of
the faith which God has revealed is put forward not as some philosophical
discovery capable of being perfected by human intelligence, but as a divine
deposit committed to the spouse of Christ to be faithfully protected and
infallibly promulgated. Hence, too,that meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to
be maintained which has once been declared by holy mother church, and there
must never be any abandonment of this sense under the pretext or in the name of
a more profound understanding. May understanding, knowledge and wisdom increase
as ages and centuries roll along, and greatly and vigorously flourish, in each
and all, in the individual and the whole church: but this only in its own
proper kind, that is to say, in the same doctrine, the same sense, and the same
understanding [36] .
CANONS
On God the creator of all
things
1. If anyone denies the one
true God, creator and lord of things visible and invisible: let him be
anathema.
2. If anyone is so bold as
to assert that there exists nothing besides matter: let him be anathema.
3. If anyone says that the
substance or essence of God and that of all things are one and the same: let
him be anathema.
4. If anyone says that
finite things, both corporal and spiritual, or at any rate, spiritual, emanated
from the divine substance; or that the divine essence, by the manifestation and
evolution of itself becomes all things or, finally,
that God is a universal or
indefinite being which by self determination establishes the totality of things
distinct in genera, species and individuals: let him be anathema.
5. If anyone does not
confess that the world and all things which are contained in it, both spiritual
and material, were produced, according to their whole substance, out of nothing
by God; or holds that God did not create by his will free from all necessity,
but as necessarily as he necessarily loves himself; or denies that the world
was created for the glory of God: let him be anathema.
On revelation
1. If anyone says that the
one, true God, our creator and lord, cannot be known with certainty from the
things that have been made, by the natural light of human reason: let him be
anathema.
2. If anyone says that it
is impossible, or not expedient, that human beings should be taught by means of
divine revelation about God and the worship that should be shown him: let him
be anathema.
3. If anyone says that a
human being cannot be divinely elevated to a knowledge and perfection
which exceeds the natural,
but of himself can and must reach finally the possession of all truth and
goodness
by continual development:
let him be anathema.
4. If anyone does not
receive as sacred and canonical the complete books of sacred scripture with all
their parts, as the holy council of Trent listed them, or denies that they were
divinely inspired : let him be anathema.
On faith
1. If anyone says that
human reason is so independent that faith cannot be commanded by God: let him
be anathema.
2. If anyone says that divine
faith is not to be distinguished from natural knowledge about God and moral
matters, and consequently that for divine faith it is not required that
revealed truth should be believed because of the authority of God who reveals
it: let him be anathema.
3. If anyone says that
divine revelation cannot be made credible by external signs, and that therefore
men and women ought to be moved to faith only by each one's internal experience
or private inspiration: let him be anathema.
4. If anyone says that all
miracles are impossible, and that therefore all reports of them, even those
contained in sacred scripture, are to be set aside as fables or myths; or that
miracles can never be known with certainty, nor can the divine origin of the
christian religion be proved from them: let him be anathema.
5. If anyone says that the
assent to christian faith is not free, but is necessarily produced by arguments
of human reason; or that the grace of God is necessary only for living faith
which works by charity: let him be anathema.
6. If anyone says that the
condition of the faithful and those who have not yet attained to the only true
faith is alike, so that Catholics may have a just cause for calling in doubt,
by suspending their assent, the faith which they have already received from the
teaching of the church, until they have completed a scientific demonstration of
the credibility and truth of their faith: let him be anathema.
On faith and reason
1. If anyone says that in
divine revelation there are contained no true mysteries properly so-called, but
that
all the dogmas of the faith
can be understood and demonstrated by properly trained reason from natural
principles:
let him be anathema.
2. If anyone says that
human studies are to be treated with such a degree of liberty that their
assertions may be maintained as true even when they are opposed to divine
revelation, and that they may not be forbidden by the church: let him be
anathema.
3. If anyone says that it
is possible that at some time, given the advancement of knowledge, a sense may
be assigned to the dogmas propounded by the church which is different from that
which the church has understood and understands: let him be anathema.
And so in the performance
of our supreme pastoral office, we beseech for the love of Jesus Christ and we
command, by the authority of him who is also our God and saviour, all faithful
Christians, especially those in authority or who have the duty of teaching,
that they contribute their zeal and labour to the warding off and elimination
of these errors from the church and to the spreading of the light of the pure
faith.
But since it is not enough
to avoid the contamination of heresy unless those errors are carefully shunned
which approach it in greater or less degree, we warn all of their duty to
observe the constitutions and decrees in which such wrong opinions, though not
expressly mentioned in this document, have been banned and forbidden by this
holy see.
SESSION 4 : 18 July 1870
First dogmatic constitution
on the church of Christ
Pius, bishop, servant of
the servants of God, with the approval of the sacred council, for an
everlasting record.
The eternal shepherd and
guardian of our souls [37] , in order to render permanent the saving work of
redemption,
determined to build a
church in which, as in the house of the living God, all the faithful should be
linked by the bond of one faith and charity. Therefore, before he was
glorified, he besought his Father, not for the apostles only, but also for
those who were to believe in him through their word, that they all might be one
as the Son himself and the Father are one [38] . So then, just as he sent
apostles, whom he chose out of the world [39] , even as he had been sent by the
Father [40], in like manner it was his will that in his church there should be
shepherds and teachers until the end of time. In order, then, that the
episcopal office should be one and undivided and that, by the union of the
clergy, the whole multitude of believers should be held together in the unity
of faith and communion, he set blessed Peter over the rest of the apostles and
instituted in him the permanent principle of both unities and their visible
foundation. Upon the strength of this foundation was to be built the eternal
temple, and the church whose topmost part reaches heaven was to rise upon the
firmness of this foundation [41] . And since the gates of hell trying, if they
can, to overthrow the church, make their assault with a hatred that increases
day by day against its divinely laid foundation, we judge it necessary, with
the approbation of the sacred council, and for the protection, defence and
growth of the catholic flock, to propound the doctrine concerning the
institution, permanence and nature of the sacred and apostolic primacy, upon which
the strength and coherence of the whole church depends. This doctrine is to be
believed and held by all the faithful in accordance with the ancient and
unchanging faith of the whole church. Furthermore, we shall proscribe and
condemn the contrary errors which are so harmful to the Lord's flock.
Chapter 1 On the
institution of the apostolic primacy in blessed Peter
We teach and declare that,
according to the gospel evidence, a primacy of jurisdiction over the whole
church of God
was immediately and directly
promised to the blessed apostle Peter and conferred on him by Christ the lord.
[PROMISED]
It was to Simon alone, to
whom he had already said You shall be called Cephas [42] , that the Lord, after
his confession, You are the Christ, the son of the living God, spoke these
words: Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona. For flesh and blood has not revealed
this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and
on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the underworld shall not
prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and
whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on
earth shall be loosed in heaven [43] .
[CONFERRED]
And it was to Peter alone
that Jesus, after his resurrection, confided the jurisdiction of supreme pastor
and ruler of his whole fold, saying: Feed my lambs, feed my sheep [44] . To
this absolutely manifest teaching of the sacred scriptures, as it has always
been understood by the catholic church, are clearly opposed the distorted
opinions of those who misrepresent the form of government which Christ the lord
established in his church and deny that Peter, in preference to the rest of the
apostles, taken singly or collectively, was endowed by Christ with a true and
proper primacy of jurisdiction. The same may be said of those who assert that
this primacy was not conferred immediately and directly on blessed Peter
himself, but rather on the church, and that it was through the church that it
was transmitted to him in his capacity as her minister.
Therefore, if anyone says
that blessed Peter the apostle was not appointed by Christ the lord as prince
of all the apostles and visible head of the whole church militant; or that it
was a primacy of honour only and not one of true and proper jurisdiction that
he directly and immediately received from our lord Jesus Christ himself: let
him be anathema.
Chapter 2. On the
permanence of the primacy of blessed Peter in the Roman pontiffs
That which our lord Jesus
Christ, the prince of shepherds and great shepherd of the sheep, established in
the blessed apostle Peter, for the continual salvation and permanent benefit of
the church, must of necessity remain for ever, by Christ's authority, in the
church which, founded as it is upon a rock, will stand firm until the end of
time [45].
For no one can be in doubt,
indeed it was known in every age that the holy and most blessed Peter, prince
and head of the apostles, the pillar of faith and the foundation of the
catholic church, received the keys of the kingdom from our lord Jesus Christ,
the saviour and redeemer of the human race, and that to this day and for ever
he lives and presides and exercises judgment in his successors the bishops of
the holy Roman see, which he founded and consecrated with his blood [46] .
Therefore whoever succeeds
to the chair of Peter obtains by the institution of Christ himself, the primacy
of Peter over the whole church. So what the truth has ordained stands firm, and
blessed Peter perseveres in the rock-like strength he was granted, and does not
abandon that guidance of the church which he once received [47] .
For this reason it has
always been necessary for every church--that is to say the faithful throughout
the world--to be in agreement with the Roman church because of its more
effective leadership. In consequence of being joined, as members to head, with
that see, from which the rights of sacred communion flow to all, they will grow
together into the structure of a single body [48] .
Therefore, if anyone says
that it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say,
by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the
primacy over the whole church; or that the Roman pontiff is not the successor
of blessed Peter in this primacy: let him be anathema.
Chapter 3. On the power and
character of the primacy of the Roman pontiff
And so, supported by the
clear witness of holy scripture, and adhering to the manifest and explicit
decrees both of our predecessors the Roman pontiffs and of general councils, we
promulgate anew the definition of the ecumenical council of Florence [49] ,
which must be believed by all faithful Christians, namely that the apostolic
see and the Roman pontiff hold a world-wide primacy, and that the Roman pontiff
is the successor of blessed Peter, the prince of the apostles, true vicar of
Christ, head of the whole church and father and teacher of all christian
people. To him, in blessed Peter, full power has been given by our lord Jesus
Christ to tend, rule and govern the universal church.
All this is to be found in
the acts of the ecumenical councils and the sacred canons.
Wherefore we teach and
declare that, by divine ordinance, the Roman church possesses a pre-eminence of
ordinary power over every other church, and that this jurisdictional power of
the Roman pontiff is both episcopal and
immediate. Both clergy and
faithful, of whatever rite and dignity, both singly and collectively, are bound
to submit to this power by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true
obedience, and this not only in matters concerning faith and morals, but also
in those which regard the discipline and government of the church throughout
the world.
In this way, by unity with
the Roman pontiff in communion and in profession of the same faith , the church
of Christ becomes one flock under one supreme shepherd [50] .
This is the teaching of the
catholic truth, and no one can depart from it without endangering his faith and
salvation.
This power of the supreme
pontiff by no means detracts from that ordinary and immediate power of
episcopal jurisdiction, by which bishops, who have succeeded to the place of
the apostles by appointment of the holy Spirit, tend and govern individually
the particular flocks which have been assigned to them. On the contrary, this
power of theirs is asserted, supported and defended by the supreme and
universal pastor; for St Gregory the Great says: "My honour is the honour
of the whole church. My honour is the steadfast strength of my brethren. Then
do I receive true honour, when it is denied to none of those to whom honour is
due." [51]
Furthermore, it follows
from that supreme power which the Roman pontiff has in governing the whole
church, that he has the right, in the performance of this office of his, to
communicate freely with the pastors and flocks of the entire church, so that
they may be taught and guided by him in the way of salvation.
And therefore we condemn
and reject the opinions of those who hold that this communication of the
supreme head with pastors and flocks may be lawfully obstructed; or that it
should be dependent on the civil power, which leads them to maintain that what
is determined by the apostolic see or by its authority concerning the
government of the church, has no force or effect unless it is confirmed by the
agreement of the civil authority.
Since the Roman pontiff, by
the divine right of the apostolic primacy, governs the whole church, we
likewise teach and declare that he is the supreme judge of the faithful [52] ,
and that in all cases which fall under ecclesiastical jurisdiction recourse may
be had to his judgment [53] . The sentence of the apostolic see (than which
there is no higher authority) is not subject to revision by anyone, nor may
anyone lawfully pass judgment thereupon [54] . And so they stray from the
genuine path of truth who maintain that it is lawful to appeal from the
judgments of the Roman pontiffs to an ecumenical council as if this were an
authority superior to the Roman pontiff.
So, then, if anyone says
that the Roman pontiff has merely an office of supervision and guidance, and
not the full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the whole church, and this
not only in matters of faith and morals, but also in those which concern the
discipline and government of the church dispersed throughout the whole world;
or that
he has only the principal
part, but not the absolute fullness, of this supreme power; or that this power
of his is not ordinary and immediate both over all and each of the churches and
over all and each of the pastors and faithful: let him be anathema.
Chapter 4. On the
infallible teaching authority of the Roman pontiff
That apostolic primacy
which the Roman pontiff possesses as successor of Peter, the prince of the apostles,
includes also the supreme power of teaching. This holy see has always
maintained this, the constant custom of the church demonstrates it, and the
ecumenical councils, particularly those in which East and West met in the union
of faith and charity, have declared it.
[councils]
So the fathers of the
fourth council of Constantinople, following the footsteps of their
predecessors, published this solemn profession of faith:
The first condition of
salvation is to maintain the rule of the true faith. And since that saying of
our lord Jesus Christ, You are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church
[55] , cannot fail of its effect, the words spoken are confirmed by their
consequences. For in the apostolic see the catholic religion has always been preserved
unblemished, and sacred doctrine been held in honour. Since it is our earnest
desire to be in no way separated from this faith and doctrine, we hope that we
may deserve to remain in that one communion which the apostolic see preaches,
for in it is the whole and true strength of the christian religion [56] .
What is more, with the
approval of the second council of Lyons, the Greeks made the following
profession:
"The holy Roman church
possesses the supreme and full primacy and principality over the whole catholic
church. She truly and humbly acknowledges that she received this from the Lord
himself in blessed Peter, the prince and chief of the apostles, whose successor
the Roman pontiff is, together with the fullness of power. And since before all
others she has the duty of defending the truth of the faith, so if any
questions arise concerning the faith, it is by her judgment that they must be
settled." [57]
Then there is the
definition of the council of Florence:
"The Roman pontiff is
the true vicar of Christ, the head of the whole church and the father and
teacher of all Christians; and to him was committed in blessed Peter, by our
lord Jesus Christ, the full power of tending, ruling and governing the whole
church." [58]
[Holy See]
To satisfy this pastoral
office, our predecessors strove unwearyingly that the saving teaching of Christ
should be spread among all the peoples of the world; and with equal care they
made sure that it should be kept pure and uncontaminated wherever it was
received.
[Custom]
It was for this reason that
the bishops of the whole world, sometimes individually, sometimes gathered in
synods, according to the long established custom of the churches and the
pattern of ancient usage referred to this apostolic see those dangers especially
which arose in matters concerning the faith. This was to ensure that any damage
suffered by the faith should be repaired in that place above all where the
faith can know no failing [59] .
[Holy See]
The Roman pontiffs, too, as
the circumstances of the time or the state of affairs suggested, sometimes by
summoning ecumenical councils or consulting the opinion of the churches
scattered throughout the world, sometimes by special synods, sometimes by
taking advantage of other useful means afforded by divine providence,
defined as doctrines to be
held those things which, by God's help, they knew to be in keeping with sacred
scripture and the apostolic traditions.
For the holy Spirit was
promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation,
make known some new doctrine, but that, by his assistance, they might
religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith
transmitted by the apostles. Indeed, their apostolic teaching was embraced by
all the venerable fathers and reverenced and followed by all the holy orthodox
doctors, for they knew very well that this see of St. Peter always remains
unblemished by any error, in accordance with the divine promise of our Lord and
Saviour to the prince of his disciples: I have prayed for you that your faith
may not fail; and when you have turned again, strengthen your brethren [60] .
This gift of truth and
never-failing faith was therefore divinely conferred on Peter and his
successors in this see so that they might discharge their exalted office for
the salvation of all, and so that the whole flock of Christ might be kept away
by them from the poisonous food of error and be nourished with the sustenance
of heavenly doctrine. Thus the tendency to schism is removed and the whole
church is preserved in unity, and, resting on its foundation, can stand firm
against the gates of hell.
But since in this very age
when the salutary effectiveness of the apostolic office is most especially
needed, not a few are to be found who disparage its authority, we judge it
absolutely necessary to affirm solemnly the prerogative which the only-begotten
Son of God was pleased to attach to the supreme pastoral office.
Therefore, faithfully
adhering to the tradition received from the beginning of the christian faith,
to the glory of God our saviour, for the exaltation of the catholic religion
and for the salvation of the christian people, with the approval of the sacred
council, we teach and define as a divinely revealed dogma that when the Roman
pontiff speaks EX CATHEDRA, that is, when, in the exercise of his office as
shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic
authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the
whole church, he possesses, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed
Peter, that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed his church to enjoy
in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals. Therefore, such definitions of
the Roman pontiff are of themselves, and not by the consent of the church,
irreformable.
So then, should anyone,
which God forbid, have the temerity to reject this definition of ours: let him
be anathema.
FOOTNOTES
1 The Profession of faith
of the other fathers added: and I pledge and swear true obedience to the Roman
pontiff, successor of blessed Peter the prince of the apostles, and vicar of
Jesus Christ
2 The profession of faith
of the other fathers continues: my subjects, or those for whom I have
responsibility in virtue of my office, hold, teach and preach the same
3 See Mt 28, 20.
4 See Heb 13, 9
5 1 Tm 2, 4.
6 Lk 19, 10.
7 Jn 11, 52.
8 See Wis 16, 12
9 Is 59, 21
10 See Lateran council IV,
const. 1 (see above, p. 230).
11 Wis 8, 1.
12 Heb 4, 13.
13 Rm 1, 20.
14 Heb 1, 1-2
15 1 Cor 2, 9.
16 Council of Trent,
session 4, first decree (see above p. 663).
17 Heb 11, 1
18 Mk 16, 20.
19 2 Pt 1, 19.
20 Council of Orange
II(529), canon 7 (Bruns 2, 178; Msi 8, 713)
21 Heb 11, 6.
22 Is 11, 12
23 1 Tm 2, 4
24 1 Pt 2, 9; Col 1, 13
25 Col 1, 12
26 Heb 2, 3
27 Heb 12, 2
28 Heb 10, 12
29 Rm 1, 20
30 Jn 1, 17
31 i Cor 2, 7-8, 10
32 Mt 11, 25
33 2 Cor 5, 6-7
34 See Lateran council V,
session 8 (see above p. 605).
35 See Col 2, 8
36 Vincent of Lerins,
Commonitorium (Notebook), 28 (PL 50, 668).
37 1 Pt 2,25
38 Jn 17, 20-21
39 Jn 15, 19
40 Jn 20, 21
41 Leo 1, Serm. (Sermons),
4 (elsewhere 3), ch. 2 for the day of his birth (PL 54, 150).
42 Jn 1, 42.
43 Mt 16, 16 19
44 Jn 21, 15-17
45 See Mt 7, 25; Lk 6, 48
46 From the speech of
Philip, the Roman legate, at the 3rd session of the council of Ephesus (D no.
112).
47 Leo 1, Serm. (Sermons),
3 (elsewhere 2), ch. 3 (PL 54, 146).
48 Irenaeus, Adv. haeres.
(Against Heresies) 1113 (PG 7, 849), Council of Aquilea (381), to be found
among: Ambrose, Epistolae (Letters), 11 (PL 16, 946).
49 Council of Florence,
session 6 (see above p. 528).
50 See Jn 10, 16.
51 Ep. ad Eulog.
Alexandrin. (Letter to Eulogius of Alexandria), Vlll 29 (30) (MGH, Ep. 2, 31
28-30, PL 77, 933).
52 Pius VI, Letter Super
soliditate dated 28 Nov. 1786.
53 From Michael
Palaeologus's profession of faith which was read out at the second council of
Lyons (D no. 466).
54 Nicholas 1, Ep. ad
Michaelem imp. (Letter to the emperor Michael) (PL 119, 954).
55 Mt 16, 18.
56 From Pope Hormisdas's
formula of the year 517 (D no. 171), see above p. 157 n. 1.
57 From Michael
Palaeologus's profession of faith which was read out at the second council of
Lyons (D no. 466).
58 Council of Florence,
session 6 (see above p. 528). S Bernard, Ep. (Letters) 190 (PL 182, 1053).
59 Bernard, Ep. (Letters)
190 (PL 182, 1053).
60 Lk 22, 32.
Return to Table of Contents
Introduction and
translation taken from Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, ed. Norman P. Tanner
END OF TEXT